Warship operational readiness integrity evaluation method based on cloud model

PENG Hui; JIANG Qiang; DENG Jianhui; WANG Yanlei; FAN Min; SONG Bin

doi:10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02337

Volume 16 Issue 6

Dec. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Supplements

Chinese Journal of Ship Research > 2021 > 16(6): 61-71. > DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02337 CSTR: 32390.14.j.issn.1673-3185.02337

PENG H, JIANG Q, DENG J H, et al. Warship operational readiness integrity evaluation method based on cloud model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2021, 16(6): 61–71. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02337

Citation:

PDF (1944 KB)

Warship operational readiness integrity evaluation method based on cloud model

1.
School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2.
The 92942 Unit of PLA, Beijing 100161, China

More Information

Received Date: March 30, 2021
Revised Date: June 30, 2021
Available Online: July 01, 2021

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Aiming at the problem that existing ship combat readiness assessment methods cannot meet the needs of naval mission support, a ship combat readiness assessment method based on cloud model theory is proposed.
Methods First, in the process of determining the index, based on the cooperative game weight method, the weights calculated by the analytic hierarchy process, entropy weight method and grey correlation method are used for the cooperative game in order to fit the combined fixed weight, and variable weight theory is introduced to modify and optimize the fixed weight. The cloud model theory is then introduced, and a fuzzy comprehensive assessment model based on the cloud model is designed using cloud similarity instead of membership degree. Finally, taking air defense tasks as an example, the combat readiness of the ship is assessed.
Results The simulation results show that under the variable weight mode, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results based on the cloud model can more accurately reflect the combat readiness of real ships.
Conclusion The results of this study can provide references for ship combat readiness assessment.
- operational readiness,
- variable weight theory,
- cloud model,
- fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References (17)

References

[1]	程文鑫, 焦自平, 白桦, 等. 武器系统使用可用性评估模型及应用[J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2002, 14(1): 81–84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3486.2002.01.022 CHENG W X, JIAO Z P, BAI H, et al. The evaluation model of weapon system operational availability and its application[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2002, 14(1): 81–84 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3486.2002.01.022
[2]	程莉莉, 罗威, 胡芷毅, 等. 舰载作战系统战备状态评价方法研究[J]. 计算机与数字工程, 2017, 45(9): 1790–1794. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9722.2017.09.021 CHENG L L, LUO W, HU Z Y, et al. Research on evaluation of the ship-borne combat system operational states[J]. Computer and Digital Engineering, 2017, 45(9): 1790–1794 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9722.2017.09.021
[3]	谢宗仁, 吕建伟, 徐一帆, 等. 大型武器装备总体战备完好性的多层次协调优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(12): 2729–2737. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2017.12.15 XIE Z R, LV J W, XU Y F, et al. Multi-level coordinated optimization of major weapon equipment's overall operational readiness indicators[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(12): 2729–2737 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2017.12.15
[4]	ZHENG K, HAN L N, GUO S L, et al. Fuzzy synthetic condition assessment of wind turbine based on combination weighting and cloud model[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2017, 32(6): 4563–4572.
[5]	魏勇, 徐廷学, 逄大鹏. 基于任务的舰炮装备战备完好性建模与仿真研究[J]. 火炮发射与控制学报, 2010(4): 15–19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6524.2010.04.004 WEI Y, XU T X, PANG D P. Modelling and simulation research on operational readiness of naval gun weapon equipment based on mission[J]. Journal of Gun Launch & Control, 2010(4): 15–19 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6524.2010.04.004
[6]	程文鑫, 陈立强, 龚沈光, 等. 基于蒙特卡洛法的舰船装备战备完好性仿真[J]. 兵工学报, 2006, 27(6): 1090–1094. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2006.06.030 CHENG W X, CHEN L Q, GONG S G, et al. Readiness simulation of ship equipment based on Monte-Carlo method[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2006, 27(6): 1090–1094 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2006.06.030
[7]	李军亮, 滕克难, 徐吉辉, 等. 军用飞机机群战备完好性研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2017, 45(3): 147–154. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2017.03.024 LI J L, TENG K N, XU J H, et al. Military aircraft fleet operational readiness research[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2017, 45(3): 147–154 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2017.03.024
[8]	李康, 黄之杰, 朱倩. 航空地面电源车战备完好性评价建模仿真[J]. 军事交通学院学报, 2017, 19(10): 24–28, 32. LI K, HUANG Z J, ZHU Q. Modeling and simulation on operational readiness of aerial power supply vehicle[J]. Journal of Academy of Military Transportation, 2017, 19(10): 24–28, 32 (in Chinese).
[9]	CHEN J, LU B. Research on universal fuzzy neural comprehensive evaluation network[C]//2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. Hong Kong, China: IEEE, 2007.
[10]	陈伟, 夏建华. 综合主、客观权重信息的最优组合赋权方法[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2007, 37(1): 17–22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0984.2007.01.004 CHEN W, XIA J H. An optimal weights combination method considering both subjective and objective weight information[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2007, 37(1): 17–22 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0984.2007.01.004
[11]	DEVANNEAUX V, KABBAJ H, DAGUES B, et al. An accurate model of squirrel cage induction machines under rotor faults[C]//Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems. Shenyang, China: IEEE, 2003.
[12]	李德清, 崔红梅, 李洪兴. 基于层次变权的多因素决策[J]. 系统工程学报, 2004, 19(3): 258–263. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5781.2004.03.007 LI D Q, CUI H M, LI H X. Multifactor decision making based on hierarchical variable weights[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2004, 19(3): 258–263 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5781.2004.03.007
[13]	刘常昱, 李德毅, 潘莉莉, 等. 基于云模型的不确定性知识表示[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2004, 40(2): 32–35. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-8331.2004.02.011 LIU C Y, LI D Y, PAN L L, et al. Uncertain knowledge representation based on cloud model[J]. Computer Engineering and Application, 2004, 40(2): 32–35 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-8331.2004.02.011
[14]	王洪利, 冯玉强. 基于云模型具有语言评价信息的多属性群决策研究[J]. 控制与决策, 2005, 20(6): 679–681, 685. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-0920.2005.06.017 WANG H L, FENG Y Q. On multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic assessment information based on cloud model[J]. Control and Decision, 2005, 20(6): 679–681, 685 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-0920.2005.06.017
[15]	路峰, 吴慧中. 网格环境下基于云模型的信任评估与决策方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2009, 21(2): 421–426. LU F, WU H Z. Research of trust valuation and decision-making based on cloud model in grid environment[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2009, 21(2): 421–426 (in Chinese).
[16]	LIN L, GANG D. A multiple classification method based on the cloud model[J]. Neural Network World Journal, 2010, 20(5): 651–666.
[17]	刘文奇. 均衡函数及其在变权综合中的应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 1997, 17(4): 58–64, 74. LIU W Q. Balanced function and its application for variable weight synthesizing[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 1997, 17(4): 58–64, 74 (in Chinese).

[1]	Zhang Wenbao, Shi Weifeng, Lan Ying, Gu Siyu, Zhuo Jinbao. Realtime power quality evaluation system of the electric propulsion ship based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2019, 14(6): 48-57. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01527
[2]	WANG Kaige, QU Junfei, WANG Peng. 模糊集和熵权法在船舶耐波性综合评价中的应用[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2014, 9(5): 33-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2014.05.006
[3]	ZHAO Nan, HU Yao, JIANG Zhifang, XIONG Zhiguo, WANG Jian. 生活区舱室布局设计模糊层次分析综合评价[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2013, 8(6): 54-62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2013.06.010
[4]	XU Weibao. 飞行员着舰的多层次模糊综合评价方法[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2013, 8(2): 17-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2013.02.004
[5]	ZHANG Dong, ZHANG Ping, FANG Qiang, ZHU Hong. 基于模糊层次分析法的舰艇维修性评估方法[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2013, 8(1): 102-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2013.01.016
[6]	Zhou Dawei, Xu Hui, Zhao Haijiang, Tu Junyong, Chen Li. 舰船主尺度论证中的多目标综合评估[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2011, 6(6): 71-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2011.06.014
[7]	Wang Jian, Chen Li. 舰船总布置中的综合评估模型及其应用研究[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2010, 5(1): 19-23,38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2010.01.005
[8]	Chen Xiaohong, Li Ying, Pu Jinyun. Assessment in the Equipment Survivability Based on the Fuzzy Comprehensive Method for Submarines[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2009, 4(1): 56-59. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2009.01.012
[9]	Xiong Jingyi, Liu Zuyuan. Approach of Multi-level Fuzzy Evaluation to Maneuverability of Submarine[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2007, 2(3): 30-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2007.03.007
[10]	Zeng Guangwu, Wu Jiuqiang, Xiao Wei, Yang Zhenjin, Xu Danlian. AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation and its Developed Program System in the Optimization of Ship Performances[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2007, 2(1): 19-23,29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2007.01.004

Supplements (1)

Supplements
Other Related Supplements
- Bilingual PDF
  ZG2337_en Download(1296KB)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	刘均，王帅，陈宇昕，李含洋，李杰. 基于云模型的能源超越保障效能评估. 舰船电子工程. 2024(08): 140-145 .
2.	梁晓玲，邓建辉，陈思均，庄德宇. 基于特征参数的任务可用能力评估. 水下无人系统学报. 2024(05): 940-947 .
3.	陈立家，周为，吴小红，王凯，黄立文，邹佳敏. 面向云航海模拟器网络的QoS保障算法研究. 中国舰船研究. 2024(S2): 204-215 . 本站查看
4.	孙文. 不确定信息下的评估指标权重配置方法. 电讯技术. 2023(06): 882-888 .
5.	刘明扬，王凯. 远程火箭炮打击平台作战效能评估. 兵工自动化. 2023(12): 62-66 .
6.	王凯，李明军. 基于云模型的炮兵远程火力目标保障效能评估. 指挥控制与仿真. 2022(06): 68-72 .

Other cited types(3)

Citation

XML

PDF in Chinese

PDF in English

Article views (731) PDF downloads (81) Cited by(9)

Warship operational readiness integrity evaluation method based on cloud model