GAN J, SHAN O, WU W G, et al. Ultimate strength analysis of typical perforated high web frame structure in cruise ships[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2021, 16(5): 181–188. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01895
Citation: GAN J, SHAN O, WU W G, et al. Ultimate strength analysis of typical perforated high web frame structure in cruise ships[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2021, 16(5): 181–188. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01895

Ultimate strength analysis of typical perforated high web frame structure in cruise ships

More Information
  • Received Date: March 07, 2020
  • Revised Date: May 31, 2020
  • Accepted Date: September 22, 2021
  • Available Online: April 29, 2021
© 2021 The Authors. Published by Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Ship Research. Creative Commons License
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  •   Objectives  The perforate high web structure is a special structure widely used in the superstructures of large cruise ships. In order to establish the design method of this kind of structure, it is necessary to fully grasp the mechanical characteristics of typical perforated high web structures used in the superstructures of large cruise ships.
      Methods  Using the nonlinear finite element theory and classical stiffened plate theory, an analysis is made of the influence law of initial deck defects, longitudinal girder specifications and web openings on the ultimate bearing capacity of the plate frame under longitudinal compression.
      Results  The thin plate frame is more sensitive to initial defects, and the initial deformation mode is different from that of the thick plate frame. The longitudinal girder ultimate capacity contribution is bigger and the sensitivity of longitudinal pressure limit capacity to the proportion and shape of holes is low. The locations of the collapse failure buckling zones are determined by the locations of the holes. The failure modes of perforated high web frame structures are revealed.
      Conclusions  The results of the influence law of key factors such as initial deck defects, geometrical dimensions of longitudinal girders and web openings on the ultimate strength of perforated high web frame structures provide guidance for the lightweight design and safety assessment of cruise ship superstructures.
  • [1]
    SMITH C S. Influence of local compressive failure on ultimate longitudinal strength of a ship’s hull[C]//Proceedings of the International Symposium on Practical Design in Shipbuilding. Tokyo, Japan: PRADS, 1977: 73-79.
    [2]
    徐向东, 崔维成. 加筋板格屈曲及极限强度分析[J]. 中国造船, 1999(1): 68–76.

    XU X D, CUI W C. Buckling and ultimate strength analysis of stiffened panels[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 1999(1): 68–76 (in Chinese).
    [3]
    贺双元, 吴卫国, 甘进. 液化天然气船船体极限强度分析[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2008, 3(6): 30–33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2008.06.007

    HE S Y, WU W G, GAN J. Analysis on the ultimate strength of LNG ship[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2008, 3(6): 30–33 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2008.06.007
    [4]
    王醍, 张延昌, 林瞳, 等. 船体梁弯曲极限强度分析[J]. 船舶工程, 2017, 39(4): 24–29.

    WANG T, ZHANG Y C, LIN T, et al. Bending ultimate strength analysis of hull girder[J]. Ship Engineering, 2017, 39(4): 24–29 (in Chinese).
    [5]
    郝金凤, 石俊令, 封毅. 极限强度对船舶结构设计的影响[J]. 船舶工程, 2010, 32(增刊2): 22–24, 32.

    HAO J F, SHI J L, FENG Y. The effect of ultimate strength on ship structure design[J]. Ship Engineering, 2010, 32(Supp2): 22–24, 32 (in Chinese).
    [6]
    杨庆山. 梁腹板开圆孔的钢框架抗震节点[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(2): 45–50, 40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2005.02.011

    YANG Q S. Aseismic connection of steel moment-resisting frame with opening on beam web[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2005, 15(2): 45–50, 40 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2005.02.011
    [7]
    张婧, 石晓彦, 钱鹏, 等. 基于材料参数、构件尺寸及初始缺陷随机特性的加筋板条极限强度研究[J]. 船舶工程, 2014, 36(6): 68–72.

    ZHANG J, SHI X Y, QIAN P, et al. Ultimate strength of ship stiffened plate under random feature of material, size and initial imperfections[J]. Ship Engineering, 2014, 36(6): 68–72 (in Chinese).
    [8]
    李政杰, 黄路, 赵南, 等. 单轴压缩下金属夹层板极限承载性能分析[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2020, 15(4): 53-58.

    LI Z J, HUANG L, ZHAO N, et al. Ultimate bearing capacity for steel sandwich panels under uniaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2020, 15(4): 53-58. (in Chinese).
    [9]
    乔迟, 张世联. 大跨度加筋板架优化设计研究[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2015, 37(8): 23–26, 30. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2015.08.005

    QIAO C, ZHANG S L. Optimization design of large-span stiffened panel[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2015, 37(8): 23–26, 30 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2015.08.005
    [10]
    KIM D K, LIM H L, YU S Y. A technical review on ultimate strength prediction of stiffened panels in axial compression[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 170: 392–406. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.10.022
    [11]
    PARUNOV J. ISSC 2012-the 18th international ship and offshore structures congress[J]. Brodogradnja, 2012, 63(4): 372–374.
    [12]
    姬振华. 船体结构的静力极限强度和砰击动力响应[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2015.

    JI Z H. Static ultimate strength and slamming dynamic response of ship structures[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2015 (in Chinese).
  • Other Related Supplements

Catalog

    Article views (808) PDF downloads (77) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return